|
Hyosung GV 250 Cruiser

|
Make Model |
Hyosung GV 250 Cruiser |
|
Year |
2004 |
|
Engine |
Liquid cooled, four stroke, 75 V twin, DOHC,
4 valve |
|
Capacity |
248 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
57 x 48.8 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
|
Induction |
26mm Mikuni |
|
Ignition /
Starting |
- / electric |
|
Max Power |
30 hp 22.4 KW @ 10500 rpm |
|
Max Torque |
20.6 Nm @ 7300 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
5 Speed / chain |
|
Frame |
Steel,
double pipe |
|
Front Suspension |
|
|
Rear Suspension |
|
|
Front Brakes |
Single disc |
|
Rear Brakes |
drum |
|
Front Tyre |
120/90 -16 |
|
Rear Tyre |
150/80-15 |
|
Dry-Weight |
150 kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
14 Litres |
Guy Allen reckons that Hyosung's new 250 Comet has
got what it takes to cut out a niche in a tough market...
By slowly working its way up from
small-capacity scooters, to small trail bikes and now road machines, Hyosung
hasn't exactly taken the local market by storm. It's been a somewhat more
stealthy approach.
Though watching the recent pricing policies
of some of its immediate competitors suggests that there are big players out
there which are taking the challenge from Korea very seriously. And so they
should.
The Comet 250 is the third Hyosung we've
taken for a fang - the others being the XLX175 trailie in August 2002 and the
Aquila 250 cruiser last December. Both acquitted themselves well, particularly
the 250.
However, the Comet moves into a potentially
more challenging area, where sports ability and outright performance is going to
be looked at a lot more closely.
So how did it perform? The air/oil-cooled
V-twin is willing enough, showing acceptable bottom-end and a healthy midrange.
Top speed on a low-kilometre example (barely run in) was in the region of
135-140km/h, which is in the ballpark for this class. It will run all day at
110km/h.
The five-speed transmission was stiff at
first, with neutral hard to find, but loosened up considerably during the run-in
period. Clutch action was fine.
Fuel consumption was a very miserly 23km/lt,
even with hard use, which suggests a very good range out of the 17-litre tank.
The gauge was very vague, though there's a tripmeter which - in combination with
the miserly consumption - means there's no excuse for running out.
Hyosung originally developed the chassis to
serve both the 250 and (with the addition of a second front disc) 600 Comets,
but has since decided to give the bigger machine something more substantial. The
effect of this was you have a frame which coped easily with the forces a 250
could chuck at it.
Steering was neutral and the suspension -
which needed some fine-tuning on our demo - showed lots of promise. Tyres were
from Shinko, which hung on okay in the dry.
Another side effect of the original 250/600
plan is the Comet is quite big by current 250 standards. Not huge, but you can
probably forget it if your height is close to the old five-foot (150cm) mark.
Taller riders will love it and I'll stick my neck out by saying it's the most
comfortable 'standard' 250 out there for bigger folk.
Brakes worked fine (our front disc had a
slight warp, which is a straightforward warranty job), and the general level of
finish was good. Maybe the simplest test of any bike is whether or not it puts a
smile on your face, and I have to say the Comet did.
The minute you mention that the machine is
Korean, people immediately conjure up images of cheap and cheerful things like
Hyundai Excel cars. Okay for the money, but not up to the standard of the
Japanese offerings. The same thinking shouldn't necessarily apply to Hyosung.
Long-term reliability out there in the market has yet to be proven, but at this
stage there's every reason to believe the powerplants should last.
As for the rest of the package, there are
areas where improvements could be made and where the longer experience of the
Japanese players shows through. But not to the extent many might think, and not
to the point where you'd automatically cross the brand off the shopping list.
In fact, the Comet's dimensions makes it one
of the more desirable 250 mounts out there for medium to tall riders looking for
maximum room to spread out. If I were in the market for this type of bike, I'd
seriously consider giving this model a go.
Source: BikePoint
|