|
Honda CB-1 400

|
Make Model |
Honda CB-1 400 |
|
Year |
1989 |
|
Engine |
Liquid cooled, four stroke, Transverse four
cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder. |
|
Capacity |
399 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
55 x 42 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
11.3:1 |
|
Induction |
2x 30mm Keihin CV
|
|
Ignition /
Starting |
CDI / electric |
|
Max Power |
55.2 hp @ 10000 rpm |
|
Max Torque |
29 ft-lb @ 9500 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
6 Speed / chain |
|
Front Suspension |
41mm Telescopic forks |
|
Rear Suspension |
Pro-link monoshock |
|
Front Brakes |
Single 310mm disc 2 piston caliper |
|
Rear Brakes |
Single 240mm disc 1 piston caliper |
|
Front Tyre |
110/70-17 |
|
Rear Tyre |
140/60-17 |
|
Dry-Weight |
183 kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
13 Litres |
|
Manual |
prozaq.demon.nl /
prozaq.demon.nl /
diff.ru
|

Going to California is a bit like stepping into the future, especially
when it comes to recreation. Whether it's jogging, piloting skateboards or
working-out with Jane Fonda (or the use of more adventurous toys like crack and
semi-automatic rifles), the Yanks always seem to be a year or two ahead of the
game.
To that list you can add the Honda CB-1. Unlike the Americans, we Brits can't
yet buy Honda's latest reinvention of the 400cc straight four. But with the
EEC's beaurocratic rodents gnawing their way ever-closer to their 1992 vision of
a 4(K)cc/47bhp limit for newly-qualified riders, bikes like the CB-1 are about
to become very small news in Europe too.
In fact the Honda's watercooled 16-valve motor, a slightly detuned version of
the unit in the race-rep CBR4(K)()RR seen only in Japan, is, at 55bhp, still
eight ponies too powerful for the likely new legislation. The difference could
easily be reduced, though, with a few horsepower "lost in the transmission", to
leave the CB-1 as the sort of unfaired,
standard-style 4(X) that is likely to be the Universal Japanese Motorcycle in
a few year's time.
Unlike the CBR and its equally fast-and-flash spec VFR4000 rival, the CB-1 is
meant not as a racer but as an all-rounder. Remember the CB400/4, that neat
little aircooled in-line four that Bike's July 1975 test tried
"desperately hard to fault", but couldn't? The 4(K)/4 was arguably the first
sporty Japanese four-stroke middleweight, and it handled and stopped as well as
it looked. Fourteen years later it's back, if not in Britain.
Like the 400/4, the CB-1 relies on a steel frame, suspension adjustable only
for shock pre-load, a wheelbase fractionally under 54 inches and a single front
disc brake. Like its then-radical forebear, the new bike wears a four-into-one
exhaust system. The CB-1 is a vastly different wok of sushi, though, with its
pipe black instead of chrome, its beefy perimeter frame tubes replacing the old
cradle, its Pro-Link shock superceding the old pair of chromed springs, and its
fat 17-inch three-spoke wheels taking the place of the 400's narrow old spoked
loops.
The CB-l's motor is also totally changed from the old bike's 37bhp single-cam
unit. Honda's 1989 technology has produced a 399cc engine with a 55 x 42mm bore
and stroke and an 11.3:1 compression ratio. The new engine is watercooled,
positioned at a 30-degree angle from vertical and used as a stressed member of
the frame. Gear-driven twin cams wallop 16 valves via under-bucket shims, a help
when you're rattling against the 13,500 redline. (And if it's less handy when
said camshafts have to be removed for valve adjustment, at least this is
necessary only every 16,000 miles.)
The CB-1 is more user-friendly on the road than it is in the workshop. Settle
into the low, narrow seat, lean forward to the raised clip-ons and you're
straddling a small, compact bike, though the 4131b Honda is no lighweight. Fire
it up and the solid-mounted motor feels smooth, despite its lack of a balancer
shaft. Slip the clutch and the bike pulls away more strongly that you'd expect
of a highly-strung 400.
It doesn't pay to be too lazy, though. Detuned by a few bhp the CB-1 mill
might be - and it has more low and midrange power than Yamaha's FZR400, for
example (ie some compared to none? - Ed) - but that 13,500 redline still gives
the power characteristics away. After picking the bike up from Honda America's
HQ somewhere in LA's huge sprawl I tooled brisky down the boulevards for a few
miles, the blue bolide zipping uncomplainingly along without ever hitting more
than seven grand. It carburets well, and as a city bike it's great.
But if you want to make the CB-1 go, you gotta rev it. On the freeway, the
short-geared Honda's 75mph, eight-grand-in-top cruise soon got tiresome so I
flicked the box down two cogs, yanked open the Keihins and thanked God my
licence came from Swansea rather than Sacramento. The four-into-one barely
whispered but the engine screamed, tingled through bars and pegs and revved
crazily towards its 115-ish top whack.
The CB-1 engine has plenty there when you ask for it, and the same goes for
its handling. The Honda was rock solid on the straights, and turning off the
freeway onto the winding Pacific fringe showed its fairly downmarket suspension
to be happy enough in the corners. The forks are pretty soft and have no
anti-dive, so a handful of powerful single disc has the front end plunging for
cover.
DG as if to say "Luxury. Tha's spoilt. When I were a lad 47 bhp were undreamt
of". Or not
Hit a bump in mid-bend, too, and the CB-l's diagonally-mounted shock
sometimes loses its cool to send a shimmy through the bars.
But most of the time the bike followed its line in the best Hollywood
tradition -hammy, but good box-office. Maybe. Rake and trail (25 degrees
and 98mm). are more conservative than the nimble FZR's figures (though the
Honda's wheelbase is shorter) but the CB-1 steered easily and neutrally on its
broad 17-inch Bridgestones. And there's plenty of ground clearance, despite that
almost-forgotten extra, the centrestand.
As a do-anything, go-anywhere motorbike the CB-1 is likely to prove as
competent as its 400/4 predecessor was all those years ago. The new Honda is
quick and agile enough to be enjoyable, though marred by a typically skinny seat
that loses its appeal even before the feeble 2.6-gallon tank runs dry.
(The pillion gets no grab-rail but at least, unlike the original 400/4, this
bike's rear footrests aren't bolted to the swing-arm . . . )
Nobody is yet admitting publicly whether the new limit will be 400cc or
47bhp, though it's likely to cover both capacity and power. We're not sure,
either, whether the restriction will apply for two years or one; whether or not
a further test will then be needed before moving to a bigger bike; or when all
this will happen.
What we do know is that the limit's coming - and soon -and that it is likely
to bring an upsurge of interest in the 400cc class. The new legislation is
frightening, and motorcycling is likely to lose far more than it gains. But look
on the bright side: if the worst of the new law is that some people have to ride
bikes like the CB-1 for a bit, then perhaps life won't be all that
terrible, after all. But I still wish they'd get off our case
Source Bike Magazine 1989

|